The Bible, Weapon of Desperate [Folder/Base] [ref, ]
Arguing about the Bible and what it is; excluding from this analysis the meaning of the matter:
This is really a priority, you can't argue about something that yo u do not know what it is. It is necessary for this discussion to define "Bible"
It does not mention 'Melhola Saulo' :S I think they are not even related :S I don't know what are you talking about :S.
I cant see where God made whom(?) against Israel ppl :S. Did you actually read the passage?
Oh!! I'm guessing you are talking about Saul right? If you are assuming that this is an imperfection I guess you need to read the explanation of this kind of pattern that appears all along the Bible that is in the Book of Job. (If you want to talk about this we can)
Oh no! you were talking about the "number" of Israel (In Ex 30:12), as I said this is a pattern...
I should put this as a rebuttal but I'm not sure if you are referring to this...
I have never heard Jesus being called like this.. can you confirm that you are making reference to him?
Jesus and Melhola? Melhola is women in Bible texts
I was asking if you can confirm that you are referring to Jesus when you say "Iosif" and if you want to clarify the name "Melhola" too, please do :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iosif
In case of Joseph is obviously a little bit different but you get the point
I don't know what "uncorrented" means, but I'm guessing that you are referring to inconsistencies?.. or something like that?
yeah inconsistences
Where are they supposed to be?
we clearly have a problem of definition of "the Bible"
I don't understand why do you think that the Bible does not fit this parameters.
Well.. what about Rich? what about ppl who likes to sleep with women? Likes to War?
what about them :S is for them too :S
But how? if Bible says: U shouldnt kill... War liking ppl will do it with pleasure.. how to satisfy them?
ppl who doesnt like to work and want to rob.. how about them?
We should punish them or destroy?
well, what you mean is that every part of the system have to like the manual or tutorial, and I will strongly disagree :D. but everything has to be explained in there (or the main use at least) to be considered a manual (and we can discuss about if the elements of the system liked or not or are happy with it latter right?
Sorry.. I didnt understand? What about system parts?
All this began with a
metaphor of the Systems that we create (programs) and the System that God created (this world) I'm just making reference in to the same metaphor again in your replay to respond it :)
The central part is that I disagree with this declaration: "We need declaration what will satisfy life of all groups" The manual does not have to satisfy anyone, but rather it has to ADDRESS everyone. In the case of the Bible it does, It says what will happen to each one of us, even if we don't like it.
Im sry I couldn't get the point can you rephrase? I'm sure it has some orthographic flaws.
[email protected] just to be sure, you suggested this because it seems like a better alternative to the Bible correct?
_Assigned to [email protected]_